drawings by margueritaScale Models?
JAMES T. COSTA
Director, Highlands Biological Station and H. F. and Katherine P. Robinson Professor of BiologyDepartment of Biology
132 Natural Science Building
Western Carolina University
Cullowhee, NC 28723
ONE BRIGHT sunny day in 1846, Henry David Thoreau hap-
pened upon a savage battle. The unfolding butchery didn’t
disturb the peace of rural Concord, however, for the conflict
was noiselessly conducted by ants just a stone’s throw from his cabin.
“The legions of these Myrmidons covered all the hills and vales in my
woodyard,” Thoreau reports, “and the ground was already strewn with
the dead and dying.” This was internecine war, Dresden or Austerlitz
in miniature, “the red republicans on the one hand, and the black
imperialists on the other.” Musing on the considerable myrmecine car-
nage before him, Thoreau comments, “I was myself excited somewhat
even as if they had been men. The more you think of it, the less the dif-
ference.” And therein lies a lesson for humanity, which is why these
astute observations from Walden were often reprinted as an essay in
their own right under the title “Battle of the Ants.”
As he was a keen observer and critic of nineteenth-century America
and one of the most eloquent philosophers of the relationship between
nature and human society, it is unsurprising that Thoreau should join
in a long tradition of observers who have seen parallels between insect
and human societies. A great many social thinkers of the past would
concur with him—the more you think of it, the less the difference—
which is why it is not coincidental that these insect colonies have come
to be called “societies” by entomologists to begin with. But, interest-
ingly, the society that is seen often bears an uncanny resemblance to
that of the social organism peering.
What do people see when they view insect societies? Besides repul-
sion or fascination, what sense do they make of teeming masses of
incessantly-probing ants, swarms of armed-and-dangerous hornets, or
legions of termites marching under cover of darkness? These are the
non-entomologists alike—ubiquitous, abundant, conspicuous groups
that are forces to be reckoned with. No mere masses of bugs, these col-
onies seem to be highly integrated functional units whose members
communicate, cooperate, and coordinate their efforts at such readily-
appreciated activities as defending their group, finding food, building
homes, and caring for their young much as do people.
People have long looked to the natural world for guidance and
instruction, seeking analogy, metaphor, and messages in all quarters of
the animate and inanimate worlds. It was thus inevitable, perhaps, that
these remarkable insects should have insinuated themselves into our
lore, legend, and very conceptions of ourselves as social beings. The
nineteenth-century Natural Theology tradition of seeking sermons in
stones captures the essence of the human tendency to find meaning in
nature. But what sort of meaning? Typically, meaning for a particular
philosophy of life, for how people should live. The noted myrmecolo-
gist C. P. Haskins asks, in his 1939 book Of Ants and Men, “Can we
as we gaze at the ant colony, discern any social pitfalls which menace
[ants and humans] alike, into which ants, perhaps, have fallen more
deeply than men . . . ?” (p. 5).
History suggests that any attempts to draw parallels between
humans and other organisms, and most especially attempts to moralize
from nature, are doomed to failure or worse. There is no shortage of
misguided social policies and doctrines in our century alone, born of a
woeful ignorance or selective reading of “nature.” It is precisely for
this reason that it is instructive to consider what sense has been made
of social insects, and the ways in which these organisms have provided
grist for the mills of social engineers, commentators, and poets since
time immemorial. Protagoras said that man is the measure of all
things, arguing that human knowledge is relative to the observer. This
relativity is starkly evident when the observer is projected onto the
observed, and when it comes to insectan societies humans are indeed
the measure, using themselves as the meter stick. Consider the follow-
ing sampling of social insects as model and metaphor, exploring how
remarkably divergent social views are seen written upon the same hives
and anthills.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_David_Thoreau
No comments:
Post a Comment